J. Auwera, &. Van-der, A. Vladimir, and . Plungian, Modality's semantic map, Linguistic Typology, vol.2, pp.79-124, 1998.

J. Coates, The semantics of the modal auxiliaries, 1983.

P. Collins, The modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English, English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik, pp.145-65, 1991.

R. Declerck, A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English, 1991.

R. Declerck and . Reed, Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis, 2001.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110851748

I. &. Depraetere and S. Reed, Mood and modality in English The handbook of English linguistics, pp.269-90, 2006.

B. Fraser, Hedged performatives Speech acts (Syntax and semantics 3, pp.187-210, 1975.

L. Goossens, Patterns of meaning extension, 'parallel chaining', subjectification, and modal shifts Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, pp.149-69, 2000.

M. Groefsema, Can, may, must and should: A Relevance theoretic account, Journal of Linguistics, vol.266, issue.01, pp.53-79, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00353453

M. Groussier, A propos de l'ambivalencé epistémique/déontique des auxiliaires must et may, Modèles linguistiques 2, pp.139-55, 1985.

M. A. Halliday and . Kirkwood, Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English, Foundations of Language, vol.6, pp.322-61, 1970.

L. Hoye, Adverbs and modality in English, 1997.

R. &. Huddleston and G. K. Pullum, Cambridge grammar of the English language, 2002.

G. Kennedy, Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus Using corpora to explore linguistic variation, pp.73-90, 1998.

M. Krug, Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32), 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110820980

E. Kruisinga, A handbook of present-day English, part II: English accidence and syntax 1, 1925.

P. Larreya, Quelques remarques sur have to et must. Travaux de l'Université de Saint-Etienne (Centre Interdisciplinaire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Expression Contemporaine, pp.103-124, 1982.

P. &. Larreya and . Clauderivì-ere, Grammaire explicative de l'anglais, 2005.

A. Linden and . Van, The semantic development of 'essential', 'crucial' and 'needful': Paths to deontic meaning, Preprints Catholic University of Leuven, vol.241, 2006.

J. Lyons, Semantics. Cambridge, 1977.

J. Myhill, The Development of the Strong Obligation System in American English, American Speech, vol.71, issue.4, pp.339-88, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/455712

F. Palmer and . Robert, The English verb, 1974.

F. Palmer and . Robert, Modality and the English modals, 1990.

R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and &. Svartvik, A comprehensive grammar of the English language, 1985.

N. Smith, Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English, Modality in contemporary English, pp.241-66, 2003.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110895339.241

E. Sweetser, From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511620904

P. Tregidgo, Must and may: Demand and permission, Lingua, vol.56, issue.1, pp.75-92, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(82)90051-1

J. Verstraete, Scalar quantity implicatures and the interpretation of modality, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.37, issue.9, pp.1401-1419, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.003

P. Westney, Modals and periphrastics in English: An investigation into the semantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and their periphrastic equivalents, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110958904